Created with the Web Accessibility Wizard |
Running time analysis |
We tested SPAM against the SPADE and PrefixSpan algorithm, which also mine frequent sequences.
Sequence data was generated using the AssocGen data generator, which allowed us to specify several parameters concerning the size of the dataset (e.g. # of customers, avg. # of transactions per customer, avg. # of items per transaction)
We ran tests that varied the minimum support as well as tests that varied these dataset parameters.
SPAM runs faster than both SPADE and PrefixSpan on the datasets we tested by up to an order of magnitude
SPAM performs especially well when the the datasets contain numerous long sequences.
Slide Links:
Slide Comments:
Text-Only Version Graphic Version |